Too true bud. I just wish the camera could capture the actual moment. Maybe with the right equipment it might I use a SONY MAVICA which is a credibla camera but a digital SLR would get better results. But the car looked awsome in the ambient lighting.I just find that with a good polish, and hitting night with the street lights the car looks amazing.
That sounds good I might take your advice bud. I was looking at buying a Canon for my sons 21st He is bang into photography and has just completed a course at Aylesbury college and got a merit. He already has an EOS SLR cant remember the number but its a nice camera with auto and manual but you cant beat the convieniance of a digital camera these days can you. AND apparently the lens' are interchangable for the digi's and print cameras with Canon? So yes good idea. thank you.If you have the dollar go for an Canon EOS400d. You get **** hot results for about £500 then.
viniboy;700261 you cant beat the convieniance of a digital camera these days can you. AND apparently the lens' are interchangable for the digi's and print cameras with Canon? So yes good idea. thank you. vini[/QUOTE said:Dont be fooled, there is more at risk when using digital.Faulty memory cards being the main thing to look out for-dont but cheap ones.Your lenses will fit a 400d, but because the sensor in the camera is not full frame-it will x the lens you use by 1.5x so
A 28-300mm would become a 42-450mm.
I like the first pic best.
Well I was in two minds. The originals looked fine but were fooked. But at least they are white and not blue. I am not in favour of blue LED's. In the flesh they look much more subtle and make the bonnet look longer. but like you said.....each too their own no offence was taken.your car looks like it's floating in the first pic lol.
gorgeous pics.
not digging the glowing wiper nozzles though, but to each his own![]()